Answers to your burning digital media questions
Like this Article?
Consider sharing it with your friends.
Hey all: thanks for a great start to this semester. Without further adieu, answers to some of your best questions from last week's blog post. As always, keep questions coming in the comments below and Ross will answer them next week!
Broadcast Media has had the power & influence for the last half century. Will Social Media become more influential than broadcast media?
Interesting question. I think we'll see the two converge more and more going forward. After all, are you following "broadcast media" when you interact with ABC News on Facebook – or following along with livetweets during a major broadcast like the Oscars? While we might not watch TV shows through over-the-air antennas or cable TV, I think we still will through online streaming services like Netflix. There's a great book worth checking out if you're interested in more on this topic: "Television is the New Television." It's a bit of a contrarian take, but is a very interesting look at the future of media and advertising.
The question that I want to know related to social media is should companies be expected to follow back their fans on different social media platforms?
I don't know if brands necessarily need to follow their fans back. For example, if I follow Oreo cookies on Twitter (one of the best brand Twitter accounts), do I really expect Oreo's social media team to read every one of my tweets? What is the benefit to their brand in doing so, and what is the cost in terms of staff time and resources? Odds are, there's not that great of a benefit. That said, I do think it is important for brands to respond to customer feedback online when required. If I tweet Delta Airlines about a flight issue, I don't expect them to follow all my tweets going forward, but I do expect them to answer my specific flight question or direct me to a place where I can get help. For some smaller businesses – especially "mom and pop" businesses that have close personal relationships with their customers – following back might make good business sense, but for large brands, I think it's not that important.
If a brand is frequently responding to customers tweets on Twitter, and the timeline of its followers is flooded with tweets by the brand, doesn't that get annoying, and almost counter productive?
Twitter only shows you replies from mutual followers. For instance, if Delta Airlines replies to a tweet of mine on Twitter, you'll only see it in your timeline if you follow both me and Delta. If you just follow Delta and NOT me, you won't see that tweet - unless you log in to Delta's Twitter profile on the web and specifically look for their interactions with followers. Because Twitter operates this way, it's possible for the largest brands to directly respond to individual tweets without driving everyone crazy.
That's also why you see some accounts on Twitter preface a reply with a period, like:
.@mehraban My section is better than yours!
The period before @mehraban's username "tricks" Twitter into showing this tweet to all of my followers, and not just people who follow both me and Derek Mehraban. You could use a letter or symbol other than a period too, and it will accomplish the same thing - the period is just the standard convention used for this.
My question on social media is about the future of social media. Are we destined for this "contet hub" of everything in one place? Or are even more social media platforms going to keep being produced? And what else can they possibly do?
At the turn of the 20th century, many people thought everything that could possibly be invented already existed. They were later proven wrong by everything from the computer to television to – you see where I'm going. I expect we'll always see new media platforms emerge, considering technology will continue to evolve and improve. Who knows what will be next? With virtual reality headsets like Oculus Rift about to really reach the consumer market, I could see a new social network emerging around VR content (Facebook owns Oculus, so they clearly see potential here). With self-driving cars on the horizon, what opportunities does that present for new social networking? I'm excited for whatever is next, and hope you are too!
I understand the importantance of a strong social media presence for today's brands. But, I want to know, how can establish credibility through social media?
The same way you establish credibility in "real life": share smart takes on things. Come up with original thoughts and concepts. Be generally right when you predict things. Be nice to people. Et cetera. There's no quick way to build credibility – it takes time – but it's why it is so important to really think about what you post online. It takes years to build credibility, but it can be lost in an instant.
Keep the questions coming for next week!
Comments & Feedback
I think personally that companies definitely have to. They have to do it in a careful way though. The philosophy that the customer is always right i think works the best when dealing with customers that have had bad experiences. If you as a company can show compassion and apologize to your customers it shows you care about their business!
How do you know which words and phrases to use to optimize your website search results?
My question has to do with measurement and KPIs. How often should brands be looking at metrics and analytics and restructuring goals, tactics and content based off this evaluation?
My brand is the QQ. I use social platform because it found. This is a very comprehensive site .QQ have a series of comprehensive software, but I want to know, so much the content of the website will make it?
Do consumers get annoyeed when they have to keep switching websites to look for what they need, or is it easier just to have everything in one place?
My brand is Target and I noticed on their main website that it is filled with tons of information, featured products and mutiple categories. I feel that a lot of products and categories might overwhelm the customer and have them confused on where to start their search or where to find a specific product. How much information should a website have on their main page?
Many brands have their social media website, but some of them are not trusted. How to build the professional and official profile of a brand?
Google+ is a social media site that hasn't really taken off. However, for my brand, Honeywell, it is tied as their best social media site along side twitter. The majority of Google+'s users are people in the technology and engineering fields, which remains true for those who interact with Honeywell's Google+. What would be a good way to either: 1. Get those same users in the same numbers on Honeywell's other social media pages. 2. Use those who follow their Google+ page to help drive the Google+ numbers even higher.
I think for a successful company, having a creative and an organized website is very important. So for a bigger company, or a successful company, should it has the website branches for each country? Or at least each state area? Because it will probably give people convenient for shopping.
My brand is Lancome. I don't know if brands necessarily need to follow their fans back.I know that some companies hire another company to handle their social media and analytics, do you think this is more effective or is it better for a company to have an in-house social media person?
My brand is JC Penny, and it's most successful social media platform is Instagram. But it doesn't include purchasing link towards the product they share, so the most important function for JC Penny's Instagram is to share looks and style. So do you think JC Penny need to add links below the picture?
How often do company's change their website layout? Is it more beneficial for a company to change it gradually or all at once?
Are websites that tend to be more generic and standard a safer route to go when building a website or are more different, attention-grabbing websites a more efficient way to market your brand and get your audience engaged?
The brand I chose is Ikea. It is very interesting to notice that links to social media platforms are placed at the bottom of their homepage for computer version, but they take up a large and obvious portion for smartphone version. Is this because social media platforms are more accessible via smartphones, and therefore they extract out and emphasize more on the social media part? My second question will be, if a brand such as Ikea is already well-known, will they usually cut their budgets for paid search visibility?
What is the best way to keep a website looking "fresh?" Blog posts? Twitter feed widgets? How do you make sure both established users and new vistors have a reason to stay on the site?
I think a lot of it has to do with understanding your target market. As long as you know what exactly your audience is interested in, it will be easy to stay "fresh".
I know that some companies hire another company to handle their social media and analytics, do you think this is more effective or is it better for a company to have an in-house social media person?
What are some good methods or ways to uncover hidden meanings or messages behind bounce rates in Google Analytic? In addition, what would you consider to be a normal bounce rate?
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
I have a question about your opinion on brands responding to complaints on social media. Do you think it is beneificial or not? Some say that its bad becuase it points out flaws with the company. While others say that is is important becuase it shows good customer service.